Powerful Holigral Holistic & Integral Development


*The Holigral Method (holigral) defines the following roles: 1) the asker of the questions, who is like a guide who helps 2) the client, who is like an explorer, to explore his-her own universe.* Accepting everything as it is “There is always something going on.” Hot Fuzz The holigral method fundamental assumes that every single thing that is happening is a signal, that is being expressed for a purpose. If a user (of the method) did not accept a behaviour or an expression as it is then they would not be listening or respecting the signal that leads to resolving the very problem that the behaviour represents. This means holigral facilitators literally accept people and things as they are - it does not mean that they bystand or indulge problems - these are WORKED WITH so that they simply no longer need to happen. Working WITH what is happening now. “Now is all there is to human experience.” Noticing gestures, words, feelings, patterns, adapting uniquely to each explorer, means that questions or instructions relate to what is happening, and signals outside of the awareness of a ‘client’ might be brought to their attention at the right time, e.g. “what does that tapping finger know?” Minimising the reality intrusion of facilitators and other delegates “Don’t tell me anything about me ... You, listen to yourself.” The signals represent, at their source, mainly intrusions into the person - shocks, experiences, etc. If the guide adds new information or beliefs then the explorer has to assimilate this information, and deal with it. By not adding any information or beliefs, the explorer’s signals get to do their job faster and more efficiently. This is why guides both work with what is happening and minimise their impact on explorers. Therefore, explorers are not being taught anything; they learn for themselves how to notice their own signals and deal with them; they discover how to listen to themselves. Complex Numbers “The real and the imaginary are two sides of the same coin. The edge is light.” The universe is both real and imaginary, and this is called ‘complex’, not meaning complicated, simply meaning “both real and imaginary”. The physics of particles uses complex numbers, the physics of relativity uses complex numbers and complex space-time, the physics of radio and light waves uses complex numbers and complex spaces, and fluid mechanics addressing flight and flow also uses complex mathematics. Light and radio waves corkscrew through real and imaginary space; sometimes the wave is all real, sometimes it is all imaginary, but mostly it is a bit of both. In the real-only world when the wave signal is full strength it is all real and when it is zero strength it is all imaginary, but it still moves through space-time. And humans are complex: they have a real body and an imaginary mind. and the electro-magnetic field (like radio) is what joins them up - it is continually turning between the real and imaginary, transferring information between the two. When a person’s electric field is broken, the mind loses control over the affected body parts but can still perceive a “phantom limb”. Their mind can gain control over the field and change the body and the field - and there are now plenty of biofeedback machines that evidence this. Where a human moves their awareness they also project a very weak field that another sensitive body can pick up. For example, you have probably looked at another person from behind and they have turned around and looked back; or you may have had a feeling someone is watching you, turned and seen someone look away. This is because the mind can detect the mind, the body can see and sense the real world, and the electrical and magnetic fields are also open to sensing and interacting. There is something more than physicality involved when two people look eye to eye - anyone can feel this, and you probably have; you know there is more to life than just the real world. The Quantum Physics of Measurement, and the Uncertainty Principle “Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, Running Bear, Dances with Wolves ... these names combine both object and movement ... native American is a more complete language than English.” Life’s problems come from the world around shaping individual reality, in peak moments of experience, which Holigral calls ‘digital conditioning’ or during gradual periods of cultural influence, which Holigral calls ‘analogue conditioning’. Holigral calls the conditioning a ‘measurement’ because the individual’s system literally does record peak experiences as emotional memories, and absorbs the influences of the world around; and both of these phenomena are different kinds of measurement. The brain’s two sides measure different kinds of experience; one side measures object-location and deals with grammar and language, and other other side deals with moving experience - momentum. So funnily enough, brains are wired to measure just like quantum physics - either location or momentum accurately or both to a less accurate sense. Measurement is made as both a real and an imaginary experience, either in location or in momentum. Because it is both real and imaginary, it is called “complex” mathematically, and the laws of complex mathematics apply. By applying the inverse to the measurement, it can be undone. In complex mathematics, there are “Hermitian Matrices”, which apply here, with the useful property of being “self-inverse”, meaning that the process of creating a measurement is the same as the process of destroying a measurement - “un-measuring”. A human measurement is made through the focus and movement of awareness, which is interrupted or recorded through experiences like “shock”, “association”, “intrusion” and “non-understanding”. The measurements themselves have to be sufficiently separated in storage and so they have some degrees of separation that code and hold them apart. Nature being efficient, it seems empirically that six steps separate adjacent measurements, thus a pattern of sixes and sevens is the holding structure of spaces, times and movements. Three steps give context to one measurement and the next three steps hold the context for its adjacent neighbour. Given that measurements can take one of three basic forms: digital (made instantaneously) or analogue (developed over time) or pseudo-analogue (from a series of digital events), each of these different forms of measurement requires a different kind of method for it to be released. Holigral Methods are simple and easy, step-by-step methods that make it easy for people to navigate their own mind using clean questions or instructions based upon space and time, like “and what could be just inside that?”, or “and where could that have come from?”, or “So, represent that.”. Patterns of questions are called ‘algorithms’ because just like in computing, the mind is recursive, and by applying question patterns, consistent results are obtained, reflecting the nature of the structures that form the perception. The patterns fit the structure, and are adapted to each individual person while retaining their general applicability. Six degrees of separation and the three degrees of influence “” The concept that people are separated by typically up to six degrees of separation from any other person on the planet, and that the three degrees closest influence a person, have been well researched, particularly at Harvard, under the research topic of “Social Network Theory”. This is empirical theory - in other words, this is a theory that is based upon observing; it has no underlying reason other than it is observed to be highly probable. For thousands of years philosophers have equated the outer and inner worlds; for example, in Feng-Shui and in the old saying “as above, so below; as below, so above”. Empirically, over a sample of over 100 people to date, people seem to mostly have six steps between different aspects of themselves. So we empirically observe that using patterns of about six navigating questions enable contiguous steps from A to B to C to D to E to F to G. A person does not need to control anything (their mind, body, words, self, others); left to their own devices systems self-organise. While there are many, many control-based methods in the world, designed to bring inner peace, ultimately people discover that freedom comes from no control; the control approaches work with control until it is no longer needed. Holigral methods only work with control when it appears as a perceived problem in a person’s life.

The Holigral Method (holigral) defines the following roles: 1) the asker of the questions, who is like a guide who helps 2) the client, who is like an explorer, to explore his-her own universe.

Accepting everything as it is

“There is always something going on.” Hot Fuzz

The holigral method fundamental assumes that every single thing that is happening is a signal, that is being expressed for a purpose. If a user (of the method) did not accept a behaviour or an expression as it is then they would not be listening or respecting the signal that leads to resolving the very problem that the behaviour represents. This means holigral facilitators literally accept people and things as they are - it does not mean that they bystand or indulge problems - these are WORKED WITH so that they simply no longer need to happen.

Working WITH what is happening now.

“Now is all there is to human experience.”

Noticing gestures, words, feelings, patterns, adapting uniquely to each explorer, means that questions or instructions relate to what is happening, and signals outside of the awareness of a ‘client’ might be brought to their attention at the right time, e.g. “what does that tapping finger know?”

Minimising the reality intrusion of facilitators and other delegates

“Don’t tell me anything about me ... You, listen to yourself.”

The signals represent, at their source, mainly intrusions into the person - shocks, experiences, etc. If the guide adds new information or beliefs then the explorer has to assimilate this information, and deal with it. By not adding any information or beliefs, the explorer’s signals get to do their job faster and more efficiently. This is why guides both work with what is happening and minimise their impact on explorers. Therefore, explorers are not being taught anything; they learn for themselves how to notice their own signals and deal with them; they discover how to listen to themselves.

Complex Numbers

“The real and the imaginary are two sides of the same coin. The edge is light.”

The universe is both real and imaginary, and this is called ‘complex’, not meaning complicated, simply meaning “both real and imaginary”. The physics of particles uses complex numbers, the physics of relativity uses complex numbers and complex space-time, the physics of radio and light waves uses complex numbers and complex spaces, and fluid mechanics addressing flight and flow also uses complex mathematics. Light and radio waves corkscrew through real and imaginary space; sometimes the wave is all real, sometimes it is all imaginary, but mostly it is a bit of both. In the real-only world when the wave signal is full strength it is all real and when it is zero strength it is all imaginary, but it still moves through space-time.

And humans are complex: they have a real body and an imaginary mind. and the electro-magnetic field (like radio) is what joins them up - it is continually turning between the real and imaginary, transferring information between the two. When a person’s electric field is broken, the mind loses control over the affected body parts but can still perceive a “phantom limb”. Their mind can gain control over the field and change the body and the field - and there are now plenty of biofeedback machines that evidence this.

Where a human moves their awareness they also project a very weak field that another sensitive body can pick up. For example, you have probably looked at another person from behind and they have turned around and looked back; or you may have had a feeling someone is watching you, turned and seen someone look away. This is because the mind can detect the mind, the body can see and sense the real world, and the electrical and magnetic fields are also open to sensing and interacting. There is something more than physicality involved when two people look eye to eye - anyone can feel this, and you probably have; you know there is more to life than just the real world.

The Quantum Physics of Measurement, and the Uncertainty Principle

“Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, Running Bear, Dances with Wolves ... these names combine both object and movement ... native American is a more complete language than English.”

Life’s problems come from the world around shaping individual reality, in peak moments of experience, which Holigral calls ‘digital conditioning’ or during gradual periods of cultural influence, which Holigral calls ‘analogue conditioning’. Holigral calls the conditioning a ‘measurement’ because the individual’s system literally does record peak experiences as emotional memories, and absorbs the influences of the world around; and both of these phenomena are different kinds of measurement.

The brain’s two sides measure different kinds of experience; one side measures object-location and deals with grammar and language, and other other side deals with moving experience - momentum. So funnily enough, brains are wired to measure just like quantum physics - either location or momentum accurately or both to a less accurate sense.

Measurement is made as both a real and an imaginary experience, either in location or in momentum. Because it is both real and imaginary, it is called “complex” mathematically, and the laws of complex mathematics apply. By applying the inverse to the measurement, it can be undone. In complex mathematics, there are “Hermitian Matrices”, which apply here, with the useful property of being “self-inverse”, meaning that the process of creating a measurement is the same as the process of destroying a measurement - “un-measuring”.

A human measurement is made through the focus and movement of awareness, which is interrupted or recorded through experiences like “shock”, “association”, “intrusion” and “non-understanding”. The measurements themselves have to be sufficiently separated in storage and so they have some degrees of separation that code and hold them apart. Nature being efficient, it seems empirically that six steps separate adjacent measurements, thus a pattern of sixes and sevens is the holding structure of spaces, times and movements. Three steps give context to one measurement and the next three steps hold the context for its adjacent neighbour.

Given that measurements can take one of three basic forms: digital (made instantaneously) or analogue (developed over time) or pseudo-analogue (from a series of digital events), each of these different forms of measurement requires a different kind of method for it to be released.

Holigral Methods are simple and easy, step-by-step methods that make it easy for people to navigate their own mind using clean questions or instructions based upon space and time, like “and what could be just inside that?”, or “and where could that have come from?”, or “So, represent that.”. Patterns of questions are called ‘algorithms’ because just like in computing, the mind is recursive, and by applying question patterns, consistent results are obtained, reflecting the nature of the structures that form the perception. The patterns fit the structure, and are adapted to each individual person while retaining their general applicability.

Six degrees of separation and the three degrees of influence

“”

The concept that people are separated by typically up to six degrees of separation from any other person on the planet, and that the three degrees closest influence a person, have been well researched, particularly at Harvard, under the research topic of “Social Network Theory”. This is empirical theory - in other words, this is a theory that is based upon observing; it has no underlying reason other than it is observed to be highly probable. For thousands of years philosophers have equated the outer and inner worlds; for example, in Feng-Shui and in the old saying “as above, so below; as below, so above”. Empirically, over a sample of over 100 people to date, people seem to mostly have six steps between different aspects of themselves. So we empirically observe that using patterns of about six navigating questions enable contiguous steps from A to B to C to D to E to F to G.

A person does not need to control anything (their mind, body, words, self, others); left to their own devices systems self-organise. While there are many, many control-based methods in the world, designed to bring inner peace, ultimately people discover that freedom comes from no control; the control approaches work with control until it is no longer needed. Holigral methods only work with control when it appears as a perceived problem in a person’s life.